Saturday Evening Post: The Variations of Colour

If you assemble a group of half a dozen birders together and ask a question about bird id, you’ll likely get about 10 or more different answers.

Birds don’t make it easy. Some have unusual juvenile plumage and are easy to spot. Some don’t. Some differ between breeding and non-breeding plumage (Consider the Red-necked Stint, it’s most unusual in Australia to see them fully coloured up rich red).

Discussions begin about the intricacies of variation in moult patterns, in feeding styles, of nesting and a whole range of features and characteristics.
Discussion also turns to cover all sorts of anecdotal material, and some wise birders seem to be able to determine not only the sex of every bird, but on which side of the tree the nest was on.
It’s enough for the beginner to shake their head and wander away thinking, “I only wanted to know if it was a Sparrow or an Emu!”

Most birds don’t have a wide variation of plumage so its pretty easy to settle on what a Little Pied Cormorant looks like, and why it’s not to be id’d as a Australian Pied Cormorant. Or, some are distinctive enough, think Laughing Kookaburra, as to not be easily confused.

But when it comes to Brown Falcons

This past week my Flickr and WP friend Eleanor, had made a trip to the Western Treatment Plant, and photographed a bird which, at first blush looked like a Nankeen Kestrel. It certainly started some conversation around my group of birders.

Browns are birds of the open plains and open forests.
As the text books say, “Brown bird with a variable plumage.” Which is where the problems of id begin to surface.
And variable is what seems to make id complicated sometimes.

Browns can vary from dark chocolate brown, through a marbling light brown on white, to white chests and underwings.
At a distance, a light morph Brown is easily mistaken for a Nankeen Kestrel

Here are three that show some of the variations. All of these are local birds that I’ve come across in the past couple of years.

See. “With variations”
Here is one that is similar, (if not the same bird, but I’m only guessing) that Eleanor found

For a greater discussion there is an interesting PDF file from the publication, The Emu 2003.
Much of the research was made at the Western Treatment Plant.

And here is a lovely cover of an old Gould League of Victoria publication with paintings by Susan McInnes. As can be seen, this particular book has had a long journey in our family.

It used to be said, that light coloured birds were from the wide open plains and darker birds from forested areas. But, like all anecdotal stories, they may only be true under certain circumstances. As a young tacker growing up in the wide ranging open fields of the Mallee in Victoria, it was not unusual to see light through dark birds.

Long term readers know we regularly have contact with a pair of Browns. She is of the mid-tone marbled chest, but her handsome male, that I call “Alistair” is a very light morph bird. Here he is on a turn.

To add to the complexities, some like Alistair have yellow cere and eye marks, while others are a grey-blue.

And for completeness, here is a young bird that had only been fledged a couple of days, the baby down is still showing on its head, as is the rich apricot colours.

Good Luck with id.

Enjoy.


8 thoughts on “Saturday Evening Post: The Variations of Colour

  1. A fine sett of images to illustrate your point, David!

    It can get very confusing at times!

    I particularly like the image of the young Falcon!

    Dave N

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi Dave, thanks for that. I didn’t use the young Falcon images from this season as it all came to an untimely end and I didn’t have the heart to make a story of it. Such gorgeous little dudes

      Like

  2. Your very fine essay with excellent illustrations just made my Saturday evening, David. I don’t see these beautiful raptors often enough so I particularly appreciate such a thoughtful response to Eleanor’s dilemma. Thank you!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. G’day Adam, we are pretty fortunate that we have the wide lava plains that really suit the Brown Falcon, and some other raptors. 
      And as they pretty much have a fixed territory its good to be able to enjoy them all year.

      Like

  3. Most interesting post David stirring some thought. Yes birds can differ in the expected plumage seen in field guides and at times it can be off-putting and at times frustrating when we have occasional birds we have difficulty pinning an ID on. Most of the time it is due to their immature or juvenile state, which can often match more than one bird specie, as with some female species.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hello Ashley, yes, bird id is not an exact science. And at times quite frustrating. I’m not bad on the birdsd we see regularly, but put me in a new location, and I’m back to beginner. Thought I’d never be able to tell one duck from another, but slowly over the years, its become clearer.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Thanks very much David for all your wise words, and for these wonderful illustrations of just how different Brown Falcons can be. I’m proud to have contributed to the creation of this particular Post by my incorrect ID!

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Hi Eleanor, I’ve had the triptych ready for quite awhile, just didn’t have the whole story to go with it, so it was quite fortuitous that you posted the photo.
    Went to WTP yesterday, hoping to see the bird, or others, but as luck would have it, they were all hunting elsewhere. Such is birding.

    You might enjoy the story of the light one in the triptych, it was on the bush on the side of Beach Road, and we spotted it about 600-700m up the road, as we approached, the calls were, “Nankeen Kestrel”, and it wasn’t until we were close enough to see the details we all realised what it actually was.

    Liked by 1 person

G'day, Please feel free to Leave a Reply. Now auto approved

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.